pcbi.1007316.g004.tif (5.07 MB)
Mean log power and its relationship to model prediction error.
figure
posted on 2019-11-15, 19:49 authored by David M. Alexander, Tonio Ball, Andreas Schulze-Bonhage, Cees van LeeuwenUpper plots show MLP for the same two subjects in previous figures. MLP is normalized over the frequency range by subtracting a linear ramp as a function of frequency, so that event-related changes are emphasized rather than the 1/f power gradient. Conventions are otherwise the same as Fig 3. Lower plots show the time by frequency matrix of correlations between past MLP and prediction error. The real part of the trial-wise error vector (plots one and two) was generally correlated positively with the trial-wise past MLP. The PLVerror (plot three) was generally positively correlated with subject-wise past MLP.
History
Usage metrics
Keywords
future signalbrain signal0.5 radianscomponents analysisMEG recording sitesself-initiated motor taskspatiotemporal dynamicsbeta bandsPCA20 subjectsfuture phaseactivity dynamicsMEG dataphase prediction errors3 subjectsdata modelFourier analysisto-be-predicted sitepropagating wavesmeasurement arraywavelength informationPrediction accuracyPrediction resultsfuture phase activityECoG dataevent-related modelsfuture brain signalfuture ones
Licence
Exports
RefWorks
BibTeX
Ref. manager
Endnote
DataCite
NLM
DC