Comparison of m-GCIPL in None-prone group in different times.
journal contribution
posted on 2024-05-02, 17:31 authored by Niphon Chirapapaisan, Akarawit Eiamsamarng, Wanicha Chuenkongkaew, Natthapon Rattanathamsakul, Ranistha RatanaratmGCIPL: Macular ganglion cell+inner plexiform layer, Av: Average, Min: Minimum, NS: Nasal-superior, NI: Nasal-inferior, S: Superior, I: Inferior, TS: Temporal-superior, TI: Temporal-inferior, SD: Standard deviation, CI: Confidence interval, Significant differences are shown in bold.
(DOCX)
History
Usage metrics
Categories
Keywords
rising intraocular pressurerelated eye problemsinner plexiform layer96 versus 8387 ± 587 ± 1861 ± 1260 versus 8357 ± 4patients undergoing surgerygcipl analysis revealeddiv >< p48 ± 31 month 80significantly greater thickness6 months 80rnfl analysis showedrnfl thickness dueprone group ”),19 patients placed6 monthssignificantly thinnerresult showedprone groupmonths 1control grouprnfl thicknesses19 patientsvisual losssystemic conditionssuperior sectorstudy comparedsignificant differencessevere casesprospective longitudinalprone positioningprone positionp mean differenceinferior sectorgcipl thicknessesearly losscompared within74 μm43 μm3 follow23 healthy21 μm19 impacts08 μm044 ).039 ).009 ).
Licence
Exports
RefWorks
BibTeX
Ref. manager
Endnote
DataCite
NLM
DC