Predicted values (estimated marginal means) and 95% confidence intervals for the number of B-Lines, grouped by type of ultrasound probe, according to the linear mixed-effects model.
figure
posted on 2024-07-03, 17:23 authored by Lukas Aichhorn, Lisa Habrina, Tobias Werther, Angelika Berger, Erik KüngPredicted values (estimated marginal means) and 95% confidence intervals for the number of B-Lines, grouped by type of ultrasound probe, according to the linear mixed-effects model.
History
Usage metrics
Categories
Keywords
subjective image qualityspearman &# 8217secondary outcome measurespulse oximetric saturationneonates &# 8212inspired oxygen ratio19 ), respectively1584 video loopsclinical parameters contributesxlink "> singlexlink "> prospectivemicroconvex probe comparedxlink ">microconvex probeclinical datalinear probesd 4pleural linemoderately stronglung ultrasoundinterpreting scoresguiding therapiesestimated lowerdiscovered calldifferent typescurrent recommendationscomparative studycommunicating prognosescenter studybest usingalso demonstrate8 weeks66 patients
Licence
Exports
RefWorks
BibTeX
Ref. manager
Endnote
DataCite
NLM
DC