Public Library of Science
Browse

Identification percent success rates for each of the five primary analytical methods across three data partitions (with singletons both included and excluded from results), plus optimum threshold values from cumulative error estimation.

Download (0 kB)
dataset
posted on 2012-01-20, 00:11 authored by Rupert A. Collins, Karen F. Armstrong, Rudolf Meier, Youguang Yi, Samuel D. J. Brown, Robert H. Cruickshank, Suzanne Keeling, Colin Johnston

Values in parentheses show failure rate broken down into “misidentification”, “no identification” and “ambiguous” (BCM and Bold only) respectively. “Combined” refers to data generated in this study combined with collected GenBank/Bold data. Abbreviations: BCM = “best close match”; boot. = bootstrap (); excl. = excluded; incl. = included; mono. = monophyly; opt. = optimum; thresh. = threshold.

History

Usage metrics

    PLOS ONE

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC