Number of first, second and third place votes received for each potential combination of theories, models and/or frameworks (TMFs) in the third round of consensus of our case example, and the resulting points assigned to each combination.

dataset

posted on 2024-11-27, 18:40 authored by Alexandra M. B. Korall, Helen Chong, Vicki Komisar, Dawn C. Mackey, Masood Khan, Femke Hoekstra, Susan G. Brown, Pauli Gardner, Christine Hames, Andrew C. Laing, Kathryn M. Sibley

Number of first, second and third place votes received for each potential combination of theories, models and/or frameworks (TMFs) in the third round of consensus of our case example, and the resulting points assigned to each combination.

History

Usage metrics

PLOS ONE

Categories

Keywords

project investigating determinants one older adult group felt would final selection preferring research user partners testable implementation strategies support implementation processes xlink "> using identified 66 tmfs aid implementation groups hip protector use three research users step 3 ).step 1 ).xlink ">research users implementation groups implementation research tmf selection three rounds hip protectors continued research itsm ).robust implementation step guide wide variety voting yielded tools exist term care sustainability model six tmfs selecting tmfs select tmfs reproducible method paper aimed organizational readiness novel method ltc organization fracture prevention five appraisers explicitly outline exemplar application eligible tmfs eligibility criteria developing useful depth consideration consolidated framework case example based method appraised twice 23 met

Licence

Exports

RefWorks

BibTeX

Ref. manager

Endnote

DataCite

NLM

DC