Public Library of Science
Browse
Figure_2.tif (884.35 kB)

Performance of relationship estimation in 30 sequenced families using (A) GERMLINE-ERSA2.0, (B) fastIBD-ERSA2.0, and (C) ISCA-ERSA2.0.

Download (0 kB)
figure
posted on 2014-01-30, 02:50 authored by Hong Li, Gustavo Glusman, Hao Hu, Shankaracharya, Juan Caballero, Robert Hubley, David Witherspoon, Stephen L. Guthery, Denise E. Mauldin, Lynn B. Jorde, Leroy Hood, Jared C. Roach, Chad D. Huff

Area of the circles indicates the percentage of individual pairs whose estimated degrees of relationship are exactly the same as reported relationship. FS: full sibling. PO: parent offspring. UN: unrelated individuals. All ERSA analyses employed IBD masking. Histograms represent the number of pairs in each relationship category. Most of the pedigrees were ascertained on the basis of common, complex or rare, Mendelian diseases. As we have previously reported, this ascertainment can produce a downward bias in distant relationship estimates [10], which may account for the differences in relationship estimates between sequenced and simulated pedigrees for 10th through 12th degree relationships (see Figure S5).

History

Usage metrics

    PLOS Genetics

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC