Fig 9.tif (584.14 kB)
Pooled results for SRT-/CTT-studies that compared the effectiveness of implicit and explicit motor learning for the unaffected hand post-stroke.
figure
posted on 2016-12-16, 18:56 authored by E. Kal, M. Winters, J. van der Kamp, H. Houdijk, E. Groet, C. van Bennekom, E. ScherderResults concern the standardized mean differences in reaction time (in ms, for SRT-studies) or RMSE (in percentages, for CTT-studies) between repeated and random blocks. Square size indicates a study’s relative contribution to the pooled estimate. Diamond width indicates the 95% confidence interval of the pooled effect. NB: CI = confidence interval; IV = inverse variance; SD = standard deviation;
History
Usage metrics
Categories
Keywords
Systematic ReviewMEDLINEstrategies post-strokestroke patients experience difficultypatients benefittrial registriesBritish Library69 msliterature databasesImplicit Motor Learning PreservedMDmotorBIOSISSMDbalance boardCI1 studyserial-reaction time paradigmbias assessment20 studiesHigh quality studies
Licence
Exports
RefWorks
BibTeX
Ref. manager
Endnote
DataCite
NLM
DC