Fig 9.tif (584.14 kB)

Pooled results for SRT-/CTT-studies that compared the effectiveness of implicit and explicit motor learning for the unaffected hand post-stroke.

Download (584.14 kB)
figure
posted on 16.12.2016, 18:56 by E. Kal, M. Winters, J. van der Kamp, H. Houdijk, E. Groet, C. van Bennekom, E. Scherder

Results concern the standardized mean differences in reaction time (in ms, for SRT-studies) or RMSE (in percentages, for CTT-studies) between repeated and random blocks. Square size indicates a study’s relative contribution to the pooled estimate. Diamond width indicates the 95% confidence interval of the pooled effect. NB: CI = confidence interval; IV = inverse variance; SD = standard deviation;

History

Licence

Exports