10.1371/journal.pone.0084902.g003 Stanislav Kadlčík Stanislav Kadlčík Tomáš Kučera Tomáš Kučera Dominika Chalupská Dominika Chalupská Radek Gažák Radek Gažák Markéta Koběrská Markéta Koběrská Dana Ulanová Dana Ulanová Jan Kopecký Jan Kopecký Eva Kutejová Eva Kutejová Lucie Najmanová Lucie Najmanová Jiří Janata Jiří Janata Comparison of the CcbC, LmbC and LmbC G308V reaction kinetics for various substrates. Public Library of Science 2013 lmbc g308v kinetics 2013-12-27 03:31:54 Figure https://plos.figshare.com/articles/figure/_Comparison_of_the_CcbC_LmbC_and_LmbC_G308V_reaction_kinetics_for_various_substrates_/888150 <p>The following combinations of proteins and substrates were tested: (A) LmbC vs. L-proline, (B) LmbC vs. EPL, (C) LmbC vs. PPL, (D) LmbC vs. BuPL, (E) LmbC vs. PePL, (F) CcbC vs. L-proline, (G) LmbC G308V vs. L-proline, (H) LmbC G308V vs. EPL and (I) LmbC G308V vs. PPL. All reactions were performed in triplicate. The error bars indicate the standard deviation. The reaction velocity is expressed as the amount of radioactive ATP (μM) produced per minute at protein concentration 0.05 μM. Reaction conditions are described in Experimental Section.</p>