10.1371/journal.pone.0084902.g003
Stanislav Kadlčík
Stanislav
Kadlčík
Tomáš Kučera
Tomáš
Kučera
Dominika Chalupská
Dominika
Chalupská
Radek Gažák
Radek
Gažák
Markéta Koběrská
Markéta
Koběrská
Dana Ulanová
Dana
Ulanová
Jan Kopecký
Jan
Kopecký
Eva Kutejová
Eva
Kutejová
Lucie Najmanová
Lucie
Najmanová
Jiří Janata
Jiří
Janata
Comparison of the CcbC, LmbC and LmbC G308V reaction kinetics for various substrates.
Public Library of Science
2013
lmbc
g308v
kinetics
2013-12-27 03:31:54
Figure
https://plos.figshare.com/articles/figure/_Comparison_of_the_CcbC_LmbC_and_LmbC_G308V_reaction_kinetics_for_various_substrates_/888150
<p>The following combinations of proteins and substrates were tested: (A) LmbC vs. L-proline, (B) LmbC vs. EPL, (C) LmbC vs. PPL, (D) LmbC vs. BuPL, (E) LmbC vs. PePL, (F) CcbC vs. L-proline, (G) LmbC G308V vs. L-proline, (H) LmbC G308V vs. EPL and (I) LmbC G308V vs. PPL. All reactions were performed in triplicate. The error bars indicate the standard deviation. The reaction velocity is expressed as the amount of radioactive ATP (μM) produced per minute at protein concentration 0.05 μM. Reaction conditions are described in Experimental Section.</p>