%0 Figure %A I. Chen, Mark %A G. Barr, Ian %A C. H. Koh, Gerald %A J. Lee, Vernon %A P. S. Lee, Caroline %A Shaw, Robert %A Lin, Cui %A Yap, Jonathan %A R. Cook, Alex %A Huan Tan, Boon %A Phang Loh, Jin %A Barkham, Timothy %A T. K. Chow, Vincent %A T. P. Lin, Raymond %A Leo, Yee-Sin %D 2013 %T Comparison between hemagglutination inhibition (HI) and virus neutralization (VM). %U https://plos.figshare.com/articles/figure/_Comparison_between_hemagglutination_inhibition_HI_and_virus_neutralization_VM_/503188 %R 10.1371/journal.pone.0012474.g003 %2 https://plos.figshare.com/ndownloader/files/832837 %K hemagglutination %K inhibition %K neutralization %X

A) baseline sample titers (n = 45 for HI, n = 45 for VM); B) follow-up sample titers (n = 45 for HI, n = 44 for VM); C) fold rise in titer for follow-up relative to baseline titer (n = 45 for HI, n = 44 for VM). In all three panels, lines denote the reverse cumulative distribution with error bars representing the 95% confidence intervals.

%I PLOS ONE