10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002162.g004 Vadas Gintautas Vadas Gintautas Michael I. Ham Michael I. Ham Benjamin Kunsberg Benjamin Kunsberg Shawn Barr Shawn Barr Steven P. Brumby Steven P. Brumby Craig Rasmussen Craig Rasmussen John S. George John S. George Ilya Nemenman Ilya Nemenman Luís M. A. Bettencourt Luís M. A. Bettencourt Garret T. Kenyon Garret T. Kenyon Histograms of total luminance in target and distractor images as a function of the number of iterations. Public Library of Science 2013 luminance distractor images 2013-02-20 14:00:31 Figure https://plos.figshare.com/articles/figure/_Histograms_of_total_luminance_in_target_and_distractor_images_as_a_function_of_the_number_of_iterations_/397269 <p>Red bins: Total activity histograms for all test target images. Blue bins: Total activity histograms for all test distractor images. The degree that the two distributions overlap is shown as the gray shaded area, which provides a measure of whether total luminance can be used to distinguish targets from distractors. The percentage in each shaded area shows the approximate lower bound amount of overlap of the two histograms, for comparison. Top row: Total summed activity over all retinal pixels. Little, if any bias between target and distractor images was evident in the input black and white images as there is nearly complete overlap between the distributions. Subsequent rows: Total activity histograms summed over all orientation-selective elements. Second row: Bottom-up responses prior to any lateral interactions. Third - sixth rows: Total activity histograms after - iterations of the multiplicative ODD kernel, respectively. Total summed activity became progressively more separable with additional iterations, as evinced by a decrease in the overlapping areas.</p>