Kripke, Katharine Chen, Ping-An Vazzano, Andrea Thambinayagam, Ananthy Pillay, Yogan Loykissoonlal, Dayanund Bonnecwe, Collen Barron, Peter Kiwango, Eva Castor, Delivette Njeuhmeli, Emmanuel VMMC cost-effectiveness and program cost with and without increasing unit cost with client age. <p>(a) discounted cost per HIV infection averted, 2014–2028, scenario 1: unit costs the same across all age groups; (b) discounted total cost of VMMC program, 2014–2028, scenario 1: unit costs the same across all age groups; (c) discounted cost per HIV infection averted, 2014–2028, scenario 2: increasing unit cost with increasing client age; (d) discounted total cost of VMMC program, 2014–2028, scenario 2: increasing unit cost with increasing client age. Each bar represents scale-up of VMMC among the indicated age group, compared with a reference case in which male circumcision prevalence is maintained at base levels from before the initiation of the VMMC program. Error bars represent uncertainty bounds as described in [<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0157071#pone.0157071.ref011" target="_blank">11</a>].</p> HIV incidence projections;National HIV Prevalence;baseline circumcision rates;program;15- year period;client age groups;DMPPT;circumcising;HIV prevalence estimates;25 access VMMC services;Specific Age Groups;South;AIM;unit cost increase 2016-07-13
    https://plos.figshare.com/articles/figure/VMMC_cost-effectiveness_and_program_cost_with_and_without_increasing_unit_cost_with_client_age_/3900405
10.1371/journal.pone.0157071.g002