%0 Figure %A Grigoleit, Jan-Sebastian %A S. Kullmann, Jennifer %A T. Wolf, Oliver %A Hammes, Florian %A Wegner, Alexander %A Jablonowski, Stephanie %A Engler, Harald %A Gizewski, Elke %A Oberbeck, Reiner %A Schedlowski, Manfred %D 2011 %T Working memory performance. %U https://plos.figshare.com/articles/figure/_Working_memory_performance_/378299 %R 10.1371/journal.pone.0028330.g006 %2 https://plos.figshare.com/ndownloader/files/707951 %K immunology %K Mental health %K physiology %K neuroscience %X

Accuracy (A) and reaction time (B) in the computerized n-back working memory task (2-back version) 2 h after administration of endotoxin (black bars) or saline (white bars) within the same individuals, respectively. The low-dose group receiving 0.4 ng E. coli endotoxin per kg of body weight is represented on the left, and the high-dose group receiving 0.8 ng/kg on the right. The maximum possible accuracy score in (A) was 25. Data are presented as means ± SEM. Significant differences between experimental condition and respective saline control: **p<0.01 (Bonferroni post hoc test).

%I PLOS ONE