%0 Figure %A M. Bordeaux, Jennifer %A Cheng, Huan %A W. Welsh, Allison %A G. Haffty, Bruce %A R. Lannin, Donald %A Wu, Xingyong %A Su, Nan %A Ma, Xiao-Jun %A Luo, Yuling %A L. Rimm, David %D 2013 %T Comparison between ESR1 and ER protein on Yale breast cancer cohorts. %U https://plos.figshare.com/articles/figure/_Comparison_between_ESR1_and_ER_protein_on_Yale_breast_cancer_cohorts_/310401 %R 10.1371/journal.pone.0036559.g003 %2 https://plos.figshare.com/ndownloader/files/639921 %K er %K yale %K cancer %X

The natural log of the nuclear ER AQUA score determined by QIF using SP1 is shown on the y-axis and the AQUA score for ESR1 determined by qISH is on x-axis for YTMA 128, n = 167 with scores for both SP1 and ESR1 (A) and YTMA 130 1993–2005 Subset, n = 195 with scores for both SP1 and ESR1 (B). The dotted line represents the threshold for ER protein positivity. (C) Representative images from 4 cases on YTMA 128 for cytokeratin (green), DAPI (blue), and ESR1 or ER SP1 (red).

%I PLOS ONE