Assessment of machine-learning tool meta-classifiers combined with balanced voting.
Matthew A. Care
Sharon Barrans
Lisa Worrillow
Andrew Jack
David R. Westhead
Reuben M. Tooze
10.1371/journal.pone.0055895.t002
https://plos.figshare.com/articles/dataset/_Assessment_of_machine_learning_tool_meta_classifiers_combined_with_balanced_voting_/161806
<p>Machine-learning tools were combined using balanced voting to generate meta-classifiers. The best 6 individual classifiers were combined, and with iterative cycles of classifier removal 5, 4, 3 and 2 machine-learning tool meta-classifiers were tested. Survival separation between assigned ABC and GCB classes for the data sets GSE32918, and GSE10846 divided into CHOP and R-CHOP components was used for assessment. The classifiers were ordered by their average rank across the data sets; with rank determined by the p-value of the ABC/GCB separation. The Classifier Identity, Hazard Ratio (vs ABC as baseline), 95% confidence interval of the Hazard Ratio, and the resulting p-value for survival separation are shown.</p>
2013-02-12 00:30:06
machine-learning
meta-classifiers